Store CRM: the demo run shown on aepkit.tbelt.online

Goal of the dummy project: "creating a CRM for my online store".
Tool: aepkit 0.7.7 (captures/00-version.txt), Python 3.14, pytest 9.2, macOS.
Date of the run: 2026-11-08. Operating mode: Guided.

What is here
  docs/store-crm/   the four documents as they stood when the run ended
  crm/ tests/ data/ the code, the tests and the sample order export
  captures/         every command run, with its output (stdout and stderr), unedited
  captures/exit-codes.txt   the exit code of each capture
  history.txt       the commits of the run, in order

Two mistakes were planted on purpose, to show what catches them:
  1. P0-T2 was first reported DONE with a sentence instead of pasted output.
     aepkit lint flagged it (captures/06-lint-done-without-evidence.txt).
  2. P1-T1 shipped tests that only exercised the owner role.
     The Auditor's negative control failed (captures/18-p1t1-negcontrol-rejected.txt),
     the task was REJECTED and annex P1-A1 ordered the fix.

Both roles were played in turn by the author of the page. The Auditor's re-runs are
separate captures (for example 04, 09, 17, 24, 28 and 29).

Captures 06a and 06b are earlier lint passes of the same run. They caught two gaps in
the Auditor's own documents (report entries not pre-generated, and a negative control
worded so lint could not read it), fixed before the capture used on the page.

negcontrol backs up the file it breaks under the system temp folder; TMPDIR was set to
/tmp for the run, which is the path the transcripts show.

The last lint pass (captures/31-lint-final.txt) reports one issue: the same pytest
failure is pasted in the P1-T1 remediation entry and in the P1-G1 report, and lint
counts the repeated paragraph as duplicate content. The log was left as it is.

snapshots/ holds a document as it stood at an earlier commit of the run (named after the
commit in history.txt), for steps the final documents no longer show.